"Should We Fine-Tune?"
The question comes up in every AI project. You've got RAG working, but the responses feel... generic. Someone suggests fine-tuning. It sounds sophisticated. The CEO heard a podcast about it.
Before you spend $5,000 and three weeks on fine-tuning, ask: What problem are you actually solving?
The Decision Framework
> If you only remember one thing: RAG for knowledge, fine-tuning for behavior. They solve different problems.
When RAG Wins
When Fine-Tuning Wins
> Pro tip: Fine-tuning is for teaching HOW to respond. RAG is for teaching WHAT to respond about.
The Hybrid Approach
The best production systems often combine both:
The fine-tuned model "speaks your language" while RAG keeps it grounded in facts.
Best Practices Checklist
FAQ
Q: How much data do I need for fine-tuning?
Minimum 100 high-quality examples. 500-1000 is better. Quality matters more than quantity.
Q: Can I fine-tune and use RAG together?
Absolutely. Fine-tune for style/behavior, RAG for knowledge. This is common in production.
Q: How do I know if fine-tuning worked?
A/B test against the base model. If users can't tell the difference, you wasted money.
Recommended Reading
š¬Discussion
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts!
